Search results

[…] 2025), https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/FPF_CCPA-Regulations-Issue-Brief.pdf (discussing the latest CCPA rulemaking package 10 Another possible contributing factor as to why the “California model” never caught on was coordinated lobbying eorts that promoted the WPA framework. See Brendan Bordelon & Alfred Ng, Tech Lobbyists Are Running the Table on State Privacy Laws, POLITICO (Aug. 16, 2023), https://www.politico.com/ news/2023/08/16/tech-lobbyists-state-privacy-laws-00111363; Alfred […]

We are thrilled to welcome our new and returning FPF Advisory Board Members to the 17th Annual Advisory Board Meeting, taking place Wednesday, June 10 – Friday, June 12, 2026 at Yours Truly DC Hotel in Washington, D.C. This page will serve as the central hub for all event updates. Save the date and […]

[…] registration 32 Sponsored WiFi – Sponsor acknowledgement by FPF leadership during event Opportunity to give short remarks at designated event time – VIP access to closed-door Symposium Welcome Reception 21 List of registrant companies and titles (no email) prior to event – PLATINUM $10,000 (1 available) GOLD $7,000 (4 available) Please contact [email protected] for […]

[…] analysis,” said Reisman. “I’m honored to join the team and excited to help advance FPF’s mission of shaping smart policy that safeguards individuals and supports innovation.” FPF welcomes Reisman at a critical time for data governance, as Congress, federal agencies, and states increase their focus on artificial intelligence, children’s privacy, data security, and privacy […]

[…] all designed to meet the unique and changing nee ds of research and education. AARNet works closely with the research and education sector, industry, and government to promote a safe and secure internet environment, fostering innovation while protecting the integrity of Australia’s digital infrastructure. Learn more at arnet.edu.au YOUTH PRIVACY IN AUSTRALIA: INSIGHTS FROM […]

[…] app roved by the Commission upon making a determination that the guidelines meet the requirements of the regulations issued under section 6502 of this title. (3) E XPEDITED RESPONSE TO REQUESTS The Commission shall act upon requests for safe harbor treatment within 180 days of the filing of the request, and shall set forth […]

[…] the CFPB retain the final rule, or implement a new rule, as quickly as possible. FPF considers that its recommendations are discrete issues that would be largely welcome across industry, benefit consumers, and not cause significant delay . Indeed, the increased clarity they may bring may even save some implementation time . The CFPF […]

[…] third parties (paras. 106–108). On this basis, the Court maintained as valid the initial EDPS decision. 3. Broad implications and practical challenges The Court’s holdings are a welcome development, as they introduce greater flexibility in the concept of personal data. However, they also generate significant practical challenges for data controllers and raise broader implications […]

[…] Chart: Risk Assessment (DPIA) Requirements in California, Colorado, and the EU California Colorado EU FPF Analysis: CA v. CO References California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.185, subd. (a)(15) Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-1309 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 35 This comparison chart focuses on the […]